Spécial !



Version mobile
de l'aldweb Site

m.aldweb.com


Ni Français, ni Anglais ?

Essayez donc l'un de ces drapeaux :
[de] [es] [it] [pt]
aldweb

Fermer I. aldweb

Fermer II. Gratuitiels PC

Fermer III. Gratuitiels Palm

Fermer IV. Partagiciels Palm

Fermer V. iziBasic Palm

Fermer VI. Connaissance Palm

Fermer VII. Ordinateur Poche

Fermer VIII. miniPortail

Géolocalisation
Recherche




Météo / Spam / www

Météo Lyon


aldweb contre le SPAM


Newsletter
Pour avoir des nouvelles de ce site, inscrivez-vous à notre Newsletter.
S'abonner
Se désabonner
294 Abonnés
Sites web de la famille

Webmaster - Infos
Sondage
Comment trouve-tu le nouvel habillage de l'aldweb Site ?
 
Superbe !
Joli
Moyen
Moche...
Résultats
Visites

   visiteurs

   visiteurs en ligne

News Amis
Pagerank

Pub Google
forum.gifForum - Sujet n°13

Forum - Forum
-


actif  Sujet n° 13  Demoralised (PC-E500)

le 18/09/2002 @ 14:23
par Pierre

Anonyme



I thought to have some knowledge about sharp pocket computers.
Then I read the last posts about the PC-E500...
I feel myself now very low. The question and answer about "what model you have" is the only thing I succeeded to undestand...
I already know that the PC-E500 is a bit different than other sharp (ESR-H) models, but since I read the posts, when I open it, I see it like a strange creature from outer space...
Pierre
Ecrire à Pierre   Poster une réponse  Haut

[]   

DébutPrécédent [ 1 2 ] SuivantFin
Réponse n° 11
--------
le 19/11/2002 @ 21:39
par Jürgen

Anonyme

visiteur
Some years ago, I have been working on some projects for Sharp, for the "PC-E..."-family of pocket-computers.

For the PC-E500(S)/550(S), I have a book which is called "Technical Reference Manual - PC-E500". Issue 1990.3. I got it from the Information Systems Group / Personal Equipment Division of Sharp Co., Yamatokoriyama.

Another book i have is the "ESR-L Instruction Manual". It is intended for the "OZ-7000"- and "I6-7000"-Series of PC-E500.

Do you have this books or don't you know about yet?

Best regards from Germany!
Jürgen.
Ecrire à Jürgen   Poster une réponse  Haut
Réponse n° 12
--------
le 22/11/2002 @ 08:05
par Saso Tomat

Anonyme

visiteur
Juergen: Thank you very much. I must tell to everyone that I have these two books Juergen is talking about. I got them from him. He is a very nice person. As time permits I will go through them.
As mentioned in one of my previous posts above I started writing a search program for PC-E500. I decided to use a BASIC approach but I have some problems. Currently I don't have much time. When I get any further and if there is a problem I will post a question here.

Thanks,

Saso

P.S. Again, a BIG THANK YOU to JUERGEN!!!
Ecrire à Saso Tomat   Poster une réponse  Haut
Réponse n° 13
--------
le 15/12/2002 @ 00:25
par Mike

Anonyme

visiteur
Hi all.
I just got a Sharp PC-1401 and I like it a lot. Basic was never that much fun as when you code on a device you can hold in your palm :) I also have a TI-85 and have tried to program it when i was bored, but it was way too cumbersome to find the commands in the catalog or type them letter by letter. However, I can see now just how advanced these graphing calcs are compared to the oldies like my Sharp. I'd like to learn how to use the PC-1401 to its full potential, but along with the computer (which btw I got for free from one of my teachers who had long since abandoned it and now has a Casio :) ) I didn't get a manual. So,if any of you know of any manual online, please let me know.
ty much
Mike
Ecrire à Mike   Poster une réponse  Haut
Réponse n° 14
--------
le 16/12/2002 @ 16:03
par Madis K.

Anonyme

visiteur
I don't know much about your programming skills in graphics, but just in case I'll give you some hints, you might need it:
1)Always use HEX where possible, even drawing lines!!!
2)To do complex graphics, leave out the variable in the end of FOR:NEXTs nesting!!!
3)DO NOT use IFs, you can write IF X>10 THEN X=X-1 like this: X=X+(X>10)
4)Don't use LINE()-(),BF command to draw boxes, always use HEX
-----
If you combine these, then your gains are at least 50%+
Good programming,
Madis from Estonia
Ecrire à Madis K.   Poster une réponse  Haut
Réponse n° 15
--------
le 16/12/2002 @ 16:13
par Madis K.

Anonyme

visiteur
...adnd yet one thing:
If, for any reason, you haven't got a time measurement on your PC-E500 then turn to addresses &BFC6A-&BFC6C by applying:
A=(PEEK&BFC6C*65536+PEEK&BFC6B*256+PEEK&BFC6A)/64
This isn't very accurate because of the 32768Hz
counter so what you do is A=A*60/58
It gets very slow that way. This is what you
should do:
A=(PEEK&BFC6C*61440+PEEK&BFC6B*240+PEEK&BFC6A*0,9375)/58
or
A=(PEEK&BFC6C*65536+PEEK&BFC6B*256+PEEK&BFC6A)*15/928
You decide which is better(last one is slower, but easier to understand)
Ecrire à Madis K.   Poster une réponse  Haut
Réponse n° 16
--------
le 22/12/2002 @ 16:31
par Madis K.

Anonyme

visiteur
Hey, I want to hear your opinion. :)
Until now it's like I'm the only one speaking here :(
Ecrire à Madis K.   Poster une réponse  Haut
DébutPrécédent [ 1 2 ] SuivantFin
actif sujet actif   clos sujet clos   Important! Important!   Nouveau Nouveau message   -   Rectifier Rectifier message   Cloturer Cloturer sujet   Remonter Remonter
[]



 
^ Haut ^